
If you live in Google Sheets, you already know the allure and the pain of multiple IF statements. They start simple: one IF to label a lead as hot or cold. Then sales wants more bands, marketing adds regions, finance wants risk scores, and suddenly your formula bar reads like a mystery novel written in parentheses. Debugging one wrong comma can stall a report, delay decisions, and quietly burn hours of your week. For business owners, agencies, and revenue teams, these logic trees are where real decisions hide: who gets followed up, which campaign wins budget, which client is at risk. That makes multiple IF logic too important to be fragile or manual. An AI computer agent can capture the rules once, translate them into clean IF, IFS, AND, OR, and SWITCH formulas, test them against sample data, and keep them updated as your playbook evolves. Instead of hand-editing every new condition, you describe the business rule in plain language and let the agent rewrite, expand, and copy the logic across sheets. You get consistent decisions at scale, and your team gets their time (and sanity) back.
Multiple IF statements are where many businesses encode their real-world rules: lead scoring, pricing tiers, commission bands, churn risk. But as soon as you go beyond two or three conditions, formulas in Google Sheets become brittle. One misplaced parenthesis and your entire dashboard goes red.
For knowledge workers, agencies, and operators, there are two paths: manual mastery of IF logic, and automation with an AI agent that does the clicking and typing for you.
In Google Sheets, the basic syntax is: IF(logical_test, value_if_true, value_if_false) Example: in cell B2, to label scores above 80 as "Pass": IF(A2 > 80, "Pass", "Fail")
To handle ranges (e.g., A/B/C/D grades), you nest another IF inside the value_if_false slot: IF(A2 >= 90, "A", IF(A2 >= 80, "B", IF(A2 >= 70, "C", "D"))) Key principles:
Google’s IFS function tests multiple conditions in order and returns the first match: IFS(A2 >= 90, "A", A2 >= 80, "B", A2 >= 70, "C") If no condition is true, IFS returns #N/A, so you may want to add a final catch-all condition.
Real business rules rarely hinge on one column. For example, a "hot lead" might be US-based AND have a score above 80. You can write: IF(AND(B2 = "US", A2 > 80), "Hot", "Other") Or for multiple allowed countries, use OR inside AND.
Before trusting your logic:
Pros of Manual Approach
Cons of Manual Approach
Now imagine describing your rules in natural language and letting an AI computer agent do the formula work for you: open Google Sheets, write or refactor the IF, IFS, AND, OR logic, paste it down thousands of rows, even test on sample data.
Simular’s computer-use agents are built for exactly this kind of digital grunt work. They operate like a power user who never gets tired: navigating your desktop and browser, inspecting cells, editing formulas, and logging every action so you can see and adjust what they did.
Instead of wrestling with syntax, you:
Using Simular Pro, an agent can:
Because Simular emphasizes transparent execution, each edit is visible: you can inspect the exact formulas it wrote, tweak them once, and let the agent reapply the improved version everywhere.
Agencies and ops teams rarely maintain just one sheet. With an AI agent:
Because Simular’s agents can navigate the whole desktop and browser, they can:
Pros of the AI Agent Approach
Cons of the AI Agent Approach
For small, one-off analyses, hand-writing multiple IF statements in Google Sheets is still powerful. But once those formulas start to look like a spaghetti western of parentheses, it’s a sign the work belongs to an AI computer agent. Let humans decide what the rules should be. Let the agent translate, maintain, and apply those rules at machine scale.
If you’re ready to move from formula firefighting to reliable, agent-powered workflows, document your key rules and let Simular’s agents handle the rest.
Think in ordered rules, not in one giant formula. Start with the most specific condition first, then move to broader cases. In Google Sheets, that means nesting IFs so that the "else" part holds the next IF, or using IFS to list conditions in order. Always keep a final catch-all condition to handle unexpected values and avoid #N/A errors.
Use IFS when you’re checking one value against many thresholds or categories, such as scoring bands or rating tiers. IFS lets you write condition1, result1, condition2, result2 in a clean sequence, making it easier to read and debug than deeply nested IF chains. For complex mixed conditions, combine IFS with AND or OR.
Build your formula incrementally. Start with one IF, test it, then add the next layer. Use helper columns to validate intermediate results and keep a test sheet with known outcomes. Watch your parentheses closely and use consistent spacing so you can see each IF block. Finally, document the rule in plain language beside the formula.
Yes. Wrap AND or OR inside the logical_test of IF. For example, IF(AND(A2>80,B2="US"),"Hot","Other") requires both conditions, while IF(OR(B2="US",B2="CA"),"North America","Other") only needs one to be true. This is powerful for business rules like lead routing, regional pricing, or eligibility checks.
AI agents like Simular’s computer-use agents can open your Google Sheets, read your existing formulas, and rewrite or extend them based on plain-English instructions. They handle repetitive edits across many sheets, test new rules on sample data, and keep a transparent record of every change, so your logic stays accurate as your business evolves.