Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
.svg)
Your best LinkedIn content usually starts life inside Slack: a customer win, a sharp insight, a fresh product update. But copying, pasting, and formatting posts by hand is slow, error prone, and easy to forget. Connecting LinkedIn and Slack turns those moments into a repeatable publishing system. Add an AI computer agent and the loop gets even tighter: the agent listens to chosen channels, drafts ready to post updates, routes them for approval, and publishes on schedule so your brand shows up consistently without eating your team’s day.
The scrappy way many teams start: a marketer watches a #wins or #product-updates channel, screenshots or copies a message, rewrites it for LinkedIn, uploads an image, and hits Post.
Pros: Full human judgment, easy to start, zero setup.
Cons: Time consuming, inconsistent, easy to miss great moments when people are busy.
Next level is using Slack apps or simple bots. For example, post a message in a specific channel and react with an emoji to signal it should become a LinkedIn update. A workflow tool or custom bot picks it up, pushes it to a queue or directly to LinkedIn.
Pros: Reduces busywork, adds light structure, keeps everything inside Slack.
Cons: Still needs humans to draft content, approve timing, and fix mistakes. Hard to scale across brands or markets.
With a computer use agent like Simular, you move from triggers and APIs to a teammate that can actually use both tools the way a human would. The agent can:
Pros: Works across Slack, LinkedIn, docs, and analytics without custom code. High repeatability and transparent execution you can inspect.
Cons: Requires a short setup and onboarding period so the agent learns your tone, approval rules, and edge cases.
Once the AI agent is reliable on a single channel, you can:
That is where you stop "doing social" as a task and start running a consistent, agent powered system.
%20(2).svg){kind=icon}
