

You can find LinkedIn group members once you join the group, because LinkedIn shows the member roster only to people who belong. Membership is a topical filter, not a buying signal, so the real work is qualifying each member against your ideal customer profile. A Simular AI computer agent browses the roster on LinkedIn's real interface and logs the names, headlines, and companies that fit your target.
The hardest part of finding LinkedIn group members is not pulling the list. It is that LinkedIn shows that list only to people who have joined the group. Once you are in, a 20,000-member community becomes browsable. The real work then is not scraping. It is deciding which members actually match who you sell to, hire, or fund, because most members of any group are dormant or off-target.
Quick answer: to find LinkedIn group members, join the group, open its Members tab, and page through the roster while logging the people who fit your ideal customer profile. Only members can see a group's roster, so joining is step one. To do it hands-free, a Simular AI computer agent browses the member list on LinkedIn's real screen and records the names, headlines, and companies that match your target.
A group is a standing crowd around a topic, which makes it different from a one-time signal. A recruiter can work a Kubernetes group for software engineers. A tier-1 VC can watch a SaaS founders group for people raising a seed round. An HR director can source a talent-acquisition group, and a B2B creator can map newsletter authors inside a content-marketing group. The member list is the same raw material for all of them: names, headlines, titles, and companies you qualify against your own ICP. This guide covers three ways to build that list. Do it by hand first, then with a Simular AI computer agent, then with traditional scraping tools.
| By hand | Simular AI agent | Extensions & scrapers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Setup | Join the group | Show it once, about 15 minutes | Install, connect your session |
| Speed / volume | About 1 minute per member | Human-paced, unattended, hundreds/run | Fast, but front-loads the risk |
| Cost | Free, your time | Subscription | $30 to $100+/month |
| Account risk | Lowest | Low: no extension, human pace | Highest: fingerprinted, ~48h restrictions |
| ICP filtering | Full, you read each profile | Full, per member, rules applied | Often keeps everyone, off-target included |
| Best for | Under ~50 matches, one group | Many groups, kept fresh | A one-off bulk pull, risk accepted |
Fit ratio: A 14,000-member group yields only about 400 real targets, near 1 qualified name in every 35 members, leaving the roster about 97% noise before you log a single row. Derived estimate.
Say a RevOps leader joins a 14,000-member sales-operations group. Maybe 400 members are actual RevOps or sales leaders at target-size companies. The other 13,600 are job seekers, vendors, and lurkers. Qualifying by hand at about 1 minute per profile means roughly 4 hours to surface those 400. That filtering, not the joining, is the job. Unlike a poll voter, who stated a choice, or an event attendee, who registered for a date, a group member has only raised a hand for a topic.
Join the group, read the roster, and copy each qualifying member into a sheet. Zero ban risk, capped at your reading speed.
Pros: fully within LinkedIn's terms, free, and you eyeball every match. Cons: you must be an approved member first, the roster shows only a headline until you open the profile, and qualifying 400 members runs about 4 hours at roughly 1 minute each.
Instead of installing anything, you show a Simular agent one qualifying pass through a group, and it repeats it at a human rhythm.
The agent drives LinkedIn's own screens the way you do, so there is no browser extension to fingerprint and no third-party API to rate-limit. It reads the same roster a member sees, opens each profile at a human pace, and applies your ICP rule before it writes a row. You set the limits and approve the steps, so a person stays in the loop and the agent pauses on anything sensitive. The Simular Pro page covers longer unattended runs.
Pros: ICP-filtered rosters with no extension footprint, and easy to refresh across many groups. Cons: a paid subscription, a short training pass, and human-paced runs rather than instant output.
Tools such as Apollo, Waalaxy, Evaboot, PhantomBuster, LinkedHelper, Dux-Soup, Dripify, and Expandi pull data from your logged-in session. Fast, but they carry the detection risk LinkedIn hunts for, and most were built for search URLs, not a group's Members tab.
Pros: fast list builds with enrichment included. Cons: LinkedIn scans for prohibited software and extensions and can flag them almost instantly, and reports describe accounts restricted within about 48 hours. A broad member search also stops at about 1,000 results, so large groups force you to split the list.
LinkedIn scopes a group's roster to its members on purpose. A group is meant to be a semi-private room, so the list is visible from the inside, not the open web. That single rule is why joining comes before any list building. It also explains why the data needs work. A member joined a topic once, sometimes years ago, and may never open the group again. So membership tells you what a person cares about, not that they are ready to buy or move.
Advanced tactics practitioners actually use:
The common mistakes are consistent. People chase the biggest group and drown in job seekers and vendors. They treat membership as intent, then open with a demo instead of the shared topic. They let the list rot instead of refreshing it, even though B2B data decays about 22.5% a year, per research compiled by HubSpot. And they reach for an extension the week before a push. Practitioners on Indie Hackers describe the same loop on repeat. Install a scraper, pull a hundred names, and watch the account get restricted within about 48 hours. The line worth pinning up: group membership tells you what someone cares about, not that they are ready to act. It is a filter, not a signal.
The winning pattern: join the right groups, qualify members against your ICP, and let a Simular Pro agent page each roster on its own cloud VM while you are offline. Feed the matches into a targeted LinkedIn prospect list, then run an email-finding pass before you reach out. You can meet the team on the Simular page.
Join the group, open its Members tab, and page through the roster, logging each person whose headline and company match your target. Only members can see a group's roster, so joining and getting approved is step one.
Yes, if you browse at a human pace and skip fingerprinted tooling. Opening member profiles counts as activity, so keep it near the community-observed range of 80 to 200 profile views a day.
LinkedIn's User Agreement bans bots and unauthorized automation, and it fingerprints prohibited software and extensions. A Simular agent works the real interface at a human rhythm instead of injecting code into your browser.
Yes. Qualify each member by their headline and company, and keep only the titles you target, because a recruiter and a VC want different people from the same group.
Because LinkedIn shows the member roster only to people who have joined that group. If the Members tab is missing, you have not joined yet, your request is still pending an admin's approval, or the group is unlisted and invite-only. Join and get approved first, then the roster becomes visible to you the way it does to any other member.
Join each relevant group, then page through every roster at a human pace and dedupe the matches into one list. Broad groups still bump into LinkedIn's display ceilings, and B2B contact data decays about 22.5% a year, so refresh the list each quarter. A Simular Pro agent can work every group you joined on its cloud VM and keep the combined list current.